- VIN: JT3VN39W4N008****
- MPG: /
- Year: 1992
Ownership Cost for 1992 Toyota 4Runner (SR5 V6 4WD)
Estimated: $70474 over the next 5 years
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
Total |
| Depreciation |
$9203 |
$4417 |
$3865 |
$3497 |
$3129 |
$24111 |
| Insurance |
$1626 |
$1683 |
$1742 |
$1803 |
$1866 |
$8720 |
| Fuel |
$2364 |
$2435 |
$2520 |
$2621 |
$2738 |
$12678 |
| Maintenance |
$2763 |
$2912 |
$2169 |
$3122 |
$2291 |
$13257 |
| Repairs |
$977 |
$1138 |
$1298 |
$1417 |
$1627 |
$6457 |
| Taxes & Fees |
$3545 |
$3545 |
$3545 |
$3545 |
$3545 |
$5250 |
| Total Ownership Costs |
$20478 |
$12989 |
$12108 |
$12789 |
$12110 |
$70474 |
Body Class: Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV)/Multi Purpose Vehicle (MPV) Displacement CC: 2958 Displacement CI: 180.508235032 Displacement L: 2.958000 Doors: 4 Drive Type: 4WD/4-Wheel Drive/4x4 Engine Configuration: V-Shaped Engine Cylinders: 6 Engine HP: 150 Engine KW: 111.8550 Engine Model: 3VZ-E GVWR: Class 1D: 5,001 - 6,000 lb (2,268 - 2,722 kg) Make: TOYOTA Manufacturer: TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION Manufacturer Id: 1057 Model: 4-Runner Model Year: 1992 Note: All plants Other Engine Info: Electronic fuel Injection Plant Company Name: Toyota motor corp. Plant Country: Japan Series: SR5 Vehicle Type: MULTIPURPOSE PASSENGER VEHICLE (MPV)
| Model year |
COMPONENT |
Complaint |
| 1999 |
STRUCTURE:BODY |
THE FRAME HAS ROTTED OUT OF THIS VEHICLE DUE TO EXCESSIVE RUST. MOST NOTABLY ON THE PASSENGER'S SIDE TOWARDS THE REAR AXLE. APPARENTLY THIS IS A MAJOR PROBLEM WITH TOYOTA VEHICLES AND THE MANUFACTURER IS REFUSING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. *TR |
| 1992 |
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:CRUISE CONTROL |
MY HUSBAND, STANLEY W. SIRNIK BOUGHT A 1992 TOYOTA 4-RUNNER. HE ONLY HAD IT FOR TWO WEEKS WHEN HE DECIDED TO TRAVEL TO WEST VIRGINIA. STANLEY, MY BROTHER -IN-LAW AND MY YOUNG SON WAS COMING BACK FROM SHOPPING THE NEXT DAY. STANLEY PUT THE TRUCK INTO CRUISE CONTROL AT 40 MPH. HE WAS TRAVELING ALONG AT 40 MPH WHEN ALL OF SUDDEN THE TRUCK STARTED TO ACCELERATE UP TO A VERY HIGH SPEED. HE TRIED TO TAKE IT OUT OF CRUISE CONTROL BUT HE COULD NOT. HE APPLIED THE BRAKES, BUT THE BRAKES WOULD NOT WORK. TO KEEP FROM GOING OVER A CLIFF, HE RAN UP AN EMBANKMENT AND THE TRUCK FLIPPED OVER. STANLEY WAS KILLED INSTANTLY. HIS BROTHER WAS BADLY INJURED AND MY SON WAS IN THE BACK SEAT IN SHOCK. I RETAINED TWO LAW FIRMS. THE ENGINEERS SAID THE CRUISE CONTROL CAUSED THE ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF A DEFECT IN THE DESIGN. RIGHT BEFORE IT WAS TIME TO GO TO COURT IN JANUARY OF 1996, MY BIG LAWYERS ASKED THE COURT TO WITHDRAW FROM THE CASE. THE COURT GRANTED THEIR WISH. I NEVER KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH MY CASE AND WHY MY LAWYERS WANTED TO WITHDRAW AFTER KEEPING AND WORKING ON THE CASE FOR FOUR YEARS. THE LAWSUITE WAS FILED IN THE STATE OF MARYLAND. IT WAS ALL SET TO GO TO COURT WITH A JURY TRIAL. THIS ACCIDENT HAPPENED MARCH 2. 1992. THE LAW FIRMS WERE MCCARTHY, BACON, COSTELLO, WASHINGTON BUSINESS PARK SUITE 300, 4640 FORBES BOULEVARD, LANHAM, MD 20706 AND SCOTT W. ROONEY, ESQUIRE, CHARFOOS & CHRISTENSEN, P.C. DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48202. SEE ALSO ODI 1030488 *DSY |
Vehicle identification numbers:
