- VIN: JA4LT31W58Z01****
- MPG: /
- Year: 2008
Ownership Cost for 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander SE
Estimated: $40950 over the next 5 years
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
Total |
Depreciation |
$2341 |
$1123 |
$983 |
$889 |
$796 |
$6132 |
Insurance |
$1671 |
$1730 |
$1790 |
$1853 |
$1918 |
$8962 |
Fuel |
$1733 |
$1785 |
$1848 |
$1922 |
$2008 |
$9296 |
Maintenance |
$2763 |
$1884 |
$1080 |
$1021 |
$2291 |
$9039 |
Repairs |
$977 |
$1138 |
$1298 |
$1417 |
$1627 |
$6457 |
Taxes & Fees |
$719 |
$719 |
$719 |
$719 |
$719 |
$1065 |
Total Ownership Costs |
$10204 |
$7742 |
$7103 |
$7168 |
$8733 |
$40950 |
Body Class: Wagon Brake System Type: Hydraulic Displacement CC: 2400.0 Displacement CI: 146.45698582735 Displacement L: 2.4 Doors: 5 Drive Type: 4WD/4-Wheel Drive/4x4 Fuel Type Primary: Gasoline GVWR: Class 1C: 4,001 - 5,000 lb (1,814 - 2,268 kg) Make: MITSUBISHI Manufacturer: MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORPORATION (MMC) Manufacturer Id: 1052 Model: Outlander Model Year: 2008 Other Engine Info: DOHC MIVEC Plant City: OKAZAKI Plant Country: Japan Series: MEDIUM TPMS: Direct Valve Train Design: Dual Overhead Cam (DOHC) Vehicle Type: MULTIPURPOSE PASSENGER VEHICLE (MPV)
Model year |
COMPONENT |
Complaint |
2003 |
SUSPENSION |
THE VEHICLE VEERED TO THE RIGHT WHEN DRIVING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER FOR REPAIRS BUT THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO VEER TO THE RIGHT. *AK |
2008 |
EXTERIOR LIGHTING |
THIS VEHICLE WAS RECALLED IN 2009 FOR A FAILURE OF THE SWITCH WHICH ACTIVATES THE BRAKE LAMPS. MITSUBISHI RECORDS INDICATE THAT WE HAD THE SWITCH REPLACED IN MARCH, 2009, ALONG WITH ANOTHER RECALL ITEM. HOWEVER, THROUGHOUT THE FIRST HALF OF 2011, MY WIFE AND I HAD PROBLEMS GETTING THE CAR TO COME OUT OF 'PARK', AND WITH THE TRACTION CONTROL COMPUTER INDICATING MALFUNCTIONS. ON THE WAY TO THE DEALERSHIP TO HAVE THOSE ISSUES INVESTIGATED, I FOLLOWED THE VEHICLE, AND NOTICED THAT MOST OF THE TIME, THE BRAKE LIGHTS DID NOT ACTIVATE WHEN THE BRAKES WERE APPLIED. THE DEALERSHIP DISCOVERED THAT ALL THREE PROBLEMS WERE CAUSED BY MALFUNCTIONS OF THE BRAKE LAMP SWITCH, AND REPLACED IT. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, IT HAS WORKED CORRECTLY SINCE THEN. HOWEVER, I AM EXTREMELY CONCERNED ABOUT THE FAILURE OF THE SWITCH. AFTER ALL, THAT'S A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF A MAJOR SAFETY SYSTEM, AND RECALL SERVICE HAD BEEN PERFORMED WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO PREVENT THAT VERY SAME PREMATURE FAILURE. IT IS MY OPINION THAT AN IMPORTANT SAFETY COMPONENT SUCH AS THE BRAKE LAMP SYSTEM SHOULD NOT SUFFER A FAILURE AFTER 3.5 YEARS OF SERVICE AND 60,000 MILES. I'M DOUBLY CONFIDENT THAT FAILURE SHOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED AFTER THE SCRUTINY YOUR ORGANIZATION HAS ALREADY APPLIED TO THIS ISSUE. *TR |
Vehicle identification numbers: