- VIN: 2LMDJ8JK2CBL1****
- MPG: /
- Year: 2012
Ownership Cost for 2012 Lincoln MKX Base
Estimated: $48336 over the next 5 years
|
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
Total |
| Depreciation |
$3775 |
$1812 |
$1585 |
$1434 |
$1283 |
$9889 |
| Insurance |
$1929 |
$1996 |
$2066 |
$2138 |
$2213 |
$10342 |
| Fuel |
$1950 |
$2009 |
$2079 |
$2162 |
$2259 |
$10459 |
| Maintenance |
$2555 |
$1903 |
$1232 |
$1519 |
$2195 |
$9404 |
| Repairs |
$917 |
$1083 |
$1234 |
$1354 |
$1558 |
$6146 |
| Taxes & Fees |
$1415 |
$1415 |
$1415 |
$1415 |
$1415 |
$2096 |
| Total Ownership Costs |
$12540 |
$8963 |
$8401 |
$8739 |
$9692 |
$48336 |
Air Bag Loc Front: 1st Row (Driver & Passenger) Air Bag Loc Side: 1st & 2nd Rows Body Class: Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV)/Multi Purpose Vehicle (MPV) Brake System Type: Hydraulic Displacement CC: 3700.0 Displacement CI: 225.78785315050 Displacement L: 3.7 Doors: 4 Drive Type: AWD/All Wheel Drive Engine Cylinders: 6 Engine HP: 305 Engine KW: 227.4385 Engine Manufacturer: Ford Fuel Type Primary: Gasoline GVWR: Class 1D: 5,001 - 6,000 lb (2,268 - 2,722 kg) Make: LINCOLN Manufacturer: FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA, LTD. Manufacturer Id: 977 Model: MKX Model Year: 2012 Plant City: Oakville Plant Company Name: Oakville Plant Country: Canada Plant State: Ontario Seat Belts All: Manual TPMS: Direct Vehicle Type: MULTIPURPOSE PASSENGER VEHICLE (MPV)
| Model year |
COMPONENT |
Complaint |
| 2011 |
EQUIPMENT |
THE SIRIUS TRAVEL LINK (THRU MYLINCOLN TOUCH) DOES NOT WORK AND HAS NOT WORKED FROM DAY 1 OF PICKING UP THE SUV ON 9/27/10. AT FIRST LINCOLN WOULD NOT ADMIT ANY ISSUES BUT NOW THEY FINALLY DO BUT DO NOT SAY WHEN A FIX WILL BE AVAILABLE. I SHOULD HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT OPTION WAS NOT WORKING BEFORE THEY HAD ME SIGN A LEASE FOR THE CAR. ALOT OF US ARE PAYING FOR SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT WORK AND DO NOT KNOW IF IT EVER WILL. *TR |
| 2012 |
LATCHES/LOCKS/LINKAGES:DOORS:LATCH |
THE REAR PASSENGER DOOR LATCH MECHANISM CLOSED WITHOUT THE DOOR ACTUALLY BEING CLOSED. THIS CAUSED A FALSE POSITIVE CONDITION FOR THE "DOOR AJAR" WARNING SYSTEM. I THOUGHT THAT THE DOOR WAS SECURE, HOWEVER THE DOOR WAS IN FACT NOT LATCHED TO THE VEHICLE. MY EIGHT YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WAS SITTING IN THE SEAT. WERE IT NOT FOR THE PERCEPTION OF MY WIFE WHO SUSPECTED THAT THE DOOR WAS INSECURE I WOULD HAVE BEEN DRIVING WITH A DOOR THAT WOULD OPEN WHILE THE CAR WAS MOVING. THIS FALSE POSITIVE CONDITION IS CAUSED BY THE FACT THAT FORD HAS PLACED THE SENSOR THAT TESTS FOR THE DOOR BEING CLOSED ON THE LATCH MECHANISM RATHER THAN ON THE VEHICLE BODY. AS OUR CIRCUMSTANCES DEMONSTRATE THE SIMPLE FACT OF THE DOOR LATCH BEING CLOSED DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE DOOR IS ACTUALLY SECURED TO THE VEHICLE BODY. WHILE NO INJURIES OCCURRED IN OUR INCIDENT THE POTENTIAL FOR A SERIOUS INJURY IS OBVIOUS. HAD THE DOOR ACTUALLY OPENED MY CHILD MAY HAVE EASILY FALLEN OUT OF A MOVING VEHICLE. THE DRIVER OF THE CAR MUST KNOW WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY THAT ALL DOORS ARE TRULY SECURED. TESTING THE LATCH FOR BEING CLOSED IS NOT A SUFFICIENT TEST FOR THE CLOSURE OF THE DOORS. *TR |
Vehicle identification numbers:
