DT: WHILE ON A TRIP THE CALLER HEARD A NOISE AND THE ENGINE OVERHEATED. SHE PULLED OVER, AND SAW WHAT SHE THOUGHT IT WAS LACK OF ANTIFREEZE. SHE PUT SOME ANTI-FREEZE IN ENGINE AND TRIED TO DRIVE, BUT IT WOULD NOT RUN. HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO DEALER, AND DEALER SAID IT WAS TRANSMISSION , AND HE WAS REPLACING TRANSMISSIONS IN OTHER VANS LIKE HERS. MANUFACTURER HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED YET. *AK
2004
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
CONSUMER FEELS THAT PROBLEMS DEVELOPED WITH THE 2004 CHEVROLET VENTURE SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY.*MR THE CONSUMER RECEIVED A RECALL LETTER ON ABOUT JULY 1, 2005. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED THE CHEVROLET ASSISTANCE CENTER WHO INFORMED HIM THAT THE REPAIRS SHOULD BE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND THE SERVICE MANAGER REFUSED TO PERFORM THE REPAIRS UNDER WARRANTY. KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM, NO FLASHING LIGHT AND INOPERATIVE HORN WERE THE PROBLEM THE CONSUMER COMPLAINED OF. UNSURE WHICH OF THESE COMPONENTS WAS RECALLED. *NM